Showing posts with label big deal on madonna street (113). Show all posts
Showing posts with label big deal on madonna street (113). Show all posts

Thursday, May 20, 2010

BIG DEAL ON MADONNA STREET (113)


The Director: Mario Monicelli

What Is It: The tender branch between the end of the true crime caper and the beginning of the New Wave.  It's a classic caper flick with crooks and plot twists a plenty but these crooks, they ain't got no skill.  Thus, hilarity.

A Lil' Bit Of History: All my bitching and moaning about franchises, sequels and remakes, and this, a wonderful little bit of comedic fluff spawned, ahem, two sequels and two, count 'em two, American remakes of the film.  

A Lil' Bit More History: The film was a knock-off/satire of my most favorite of Criterion films, so far, Rififi (115).  A film that this film, no matter how much I enjoyed it, holds nary a candle too.

The Expectation: The Italian tradition of comedia all'Italiana has soured me in the past, but I've been so enamored with film in general lately, I was ready to try anything that didn't feature Jennifer Lopez or that hadn't derived from a SNL skit.  Thus, expectations were high.

The Experience: Life has, as it always does, reared its shaggy mane yet again and it took me nearly a month to slough through this one.  Which is strange as the film is one peppy burst of enjoyment after another.  I felt at times like I had swallowed a time-release pain-killer, and that every few days another lump of relief soaked in to my body.

 

1.  Marcello Mastroianni

If you love film, especially Italian film, you're a fan, or in-the-know about Marcello Mastroianni.  A staple of Fellini's films, Mastroianni was quite possibly the inventor of cool in the late 50s and 1960s.  He raged across film, embodying all the stereotypes of hip we now take for granted.  Which is why it is so strange in Big Deal On Madonna Street (113) (the film that would push him over the cliff of success) that he's a sort of complaining photographer-turned-thief with a crying baby on one arm and stern-browed wife on the other.  He's nothing like the sunglasses-wearing, lady seducing character we all know him as now.  He's a blunderer and terrible crook, and though he plays second man to Peppe (Vittorio Gassman), he's still, quite possibly the least "cool" character in the film.  This would be the type of stunt casting an actor might take on late in his career, when they'd already adopted a screen presence, and antithetical pairing like this would play off that presence.  But here it's as if Mastroianni's bumbling Tiberio, is a hint of things to come.  A shadow of the character he had hidden with him that somehow Mario Monicelli pulled to the surface.  

2.  Chuckles.

I'll be honest, old films don't make me laugh as much as new films.  Don't start throwing rocks, the humor, the language, hell, the entire culture these films derived from is different and thus the possibility of me giggling my way through one is, well, a wee bit smaller.  Oh, I appreciate that a good old comedic film has the potential to bust a gut, it's just most likely not mine.  Big Deal On Madonna Street (113) had me laughing though.  The story of a cobbled together caper gang and their attempt to rob a pawn shop isn't a riot, I wasn't rolling on the floor, but there were scenes and moments that had me barking in laughter.  The gang, in a dingy basement full of broken bikes and bottles, trying to hide from an attractive young lady - classic.  Peppe beating the hell out of a room full of drunken suitors - amazing.  I can't say why, but the collusion of actors in this film had me twisted up in chuckles, an absolute surprise and delight.

3.  A gang of side-liners.

Is it strange that in the middle of this Italian comedy about thieves in Rome, that I found myself thinking about underdog sports films?  Sure, this isn't exactly that.  There's no big beefy rival teams or inspiring moments or any of the sort, but there's something about this likable lump of losers that had me thinking about Bad News Bears and the sort.  Though each and every one of these characters is sort of a putz, I found myself rooting for their caper to succeed, their romances to be fruitful, their lives not to be so down right depressing.  I rooted from the sidelines for a bunch of knuckleheads to strut on to the field an win the big game.

4.  Losers once and for all.

And what's great about the film is, and not to ruin anything, but no one's a winner in this pick.  No one's a loser either, but if you're judging the success of the film through the success of a crime, this one's a big failure.  But that's the great thing about the film - the caper is the ruse.  The ploy to draw you in and make you comfortable, excited about action and adventure, while they're unraveling the sad little lives of these hilarious characters.  All of these louts are losers in their own right, but this little gig somehow gives them, and us, meaning.  If they can pull this off (for a never revealed sum of money) they'll have lives to live, not poverty to exist amongst.  And the film hardly focuses on the crime at hand, it focuses on these characters as fully-rounded bits of screenwriting who collide with each other for a brief moment before spinning off on to their own.  The final scene in the movie, as the characters, beaten, battered and burned are slowly peeling off in to their own respective lives (together for such a short time) drives it on home - who cares about the caper, what are these characters going to do next?

---

criterion counsel: alright, alright, getting started again.  might be another month or so before anything like this pops up though.


Wednesday, April 21, 2010

the glamour of critique

Wow, you'd think that seeing free movies three or four times a week would be a dream come true for an absolute filmic nut like myself.  And to a degree it really is.  I love going to theater.  Love sitting amongst a crowd and watching a film, be it big and dumb or small and intimate or just a standard old Hollywood clunker - I love the theatrical film experience.  As I've gotten older though, finding the money or time to get to a movie in the theater has gotten harder and harder and my precious moments spent amongst the cinema's open arms have become less and less frequent.  To the point where I'd actually started to think that perhaps home theater experiences (tiny lap-top, bed) were more enjoyable than a trip to the local moviehouse.

Thus when the opportunity to review films came along I nearly lost it.  This would mean a few things: I'd be able to see films - for free -; I'd be able to write about films; and I'd be able to head to the theater on a near weekly basis to immerse myself in the strange sweetness of the theatah. 

My little heart pittered and pattered with joy.

It's been almost three months now since I started reviewing and in some way, the glossy sheen of excitement as worn off.  It's not that I don't love films and reviewing films, it's more so the films that I'm given the opportunity to few on a weekly basis, are well, for the most part, pure shit.  I'm not joking here. I've seen five films in the last two weeks and two of them were amongst the worst films I've ever seen with one bordering on a high school History Day project and the other two sating me at least a little bit.

What I guess I never understood about being a critic is that all the shit that you get to avoid as a discerning viewer is thrust upon you in waves and instead of being able to duck out, eyes closed, screaming for the exit, you have to sit amongst it.  The Criterion Conquistador and I have sat through some truly terrible films lately and if it was not for her presence I think I might've cracked.  Even scarier, the studios do such a good job of profiling these pictures that every audience seems completely and totally won over by these horrid flick.  So not only am I permanently scarred by a J-Lo rom-com and Pierce Brosnan crying like a clown, but I have to deal with the fact that people actually enjoy these films.  That these films will make money.  That perhaps my dislike of shit-piles like The Greatest or The Perfect Game are the minority amongst a culture in love the fart jokes and melodrama.

I stand outside of almost every film I see and wonder why exactly I do this.  And I think, I hope, it's because I love movies and my need to see all of them is some sort of unending quest to find gems amongst the shit piles and not some perverse need to punish myself.

Alex and I were slowly, dazedly, walking away from The Back-Up Plan last night in near silence (a real stinker can do that to you) and as I started to chatter about my dislike of the film, my dear dear lady friend said just this:

"Maybe you shouldn't see every film they offer you."

So true.  So very, very true.

---

Criterion Counsel:  Saw perhaps a minute of Big Deal On Madonna Street (113) last night before those strangling arms of sleep took me under.  Looked good though, let me tell you.